pie title "Participation" : 5 "Individual Project (iP)" : 15 "Team Project (tP)" : 50 "exam" : 30
HEADS UP: 5 extra marks for community engagement!
Aim: A student who does well in should receive one letter grade higher than another student who doesn't do well in this aspect, all other things being equal.
Rationale: Such activities are mutually beneficial, and enhances learning of you and your classmates.
How does it work? There are at least 5 bonus marks allocated for such activities. These marks are embedded inside various grade components (i.e., iP, tP, participation).
Examples of eligible activities (non-exhaustive):
- Engaging in forum discussions.
- Helping others to test their iP/tP, as requested via the forum.
- Giving peer feedback via pull request reviews of team members (in the tP) and other students (in the iP).
- Peer evaluations in iP and tP.
- Helping to find bugs in another teams product (in the tP practical exam dry run).
What qualifies for bonus marks: While most of the eligible activities already have participation points attached to them, the bonus marks are earned by going the extra mile to help peers. Some examples:
- Providing more useful/thoughtful inputs.
- Doing notably more than the minimum requirement.
What doesn't qualify? Obvious attempts to grab bonus marks by gaming the system will not earn bonus marks though. Some examples:
- Only a short burst of activity (instead of consistent activity over the semester).
- Spammy/trivial posts/response.
- Regurgitating useless AI slop as feedback/responses.
- 'Manufacturing' bogus activities (e.g., starting superfluous forum threads)